Sunday, 20th Apr 2008 at 21:58 (software)
Tags: Firefox, full text history search, NetCaptor, opera, tabbed browsing
If you ever wandered who was first, Firefox (FF) or Opera, in implementing the full text history search accessed in the address bar. In both, Opera and Firefox, the search covers at least page titles in addition to URLs. Bay the way I’m not talking about the feature called “nickname” or “keyword” in Opera and Firefox, respectively.
So far so good, as it’s a really nice feature and it doesn’t harm at all to have it in the best two browsers there are. But never the less I was curious as of who was actually the first to introduce the feature. Not that it’ll happen like with tabbed browsing or other really helpful function introduced to “the masses” by Opera.
Excursion on tabbed browsing
Only by the fact that people switching from IE to FF in lack of knowledge about Opera, Firefox has been awarded with being the inventor. Well, actually, it was more complicated than the simple FF vs. Opera. A project called NetCaptor in 1998 had tabbed browsing before others all though it was not a fully featured http web browser instead it used IE’s socalled Tradient Layout Engine. Opera had Multi Document Interface (MDI) before other browsers but tabbed browsing is claimed to have been in mozillas trunk before Opera extended their concept of multi docoment views. So I will close this side leap by breaking it down by a term by Adam Stiles:
“Actually, tabbed browsing is over 7 years old – Firefox, Mozilla, Opera, Safari and others can all trace their tabbed browsing DNA back to NetCaptor at some level.”
Back to Full Text History Search:
For one Opera 9.5 Alpha 3 introduced this feature publicly for the Norwegian browser in Sept. 2007. And as Pavel Studený lines out Opera not only searches URLs and page titles but also complete page contents (plus shows the last visit date in the result list). From trying out without knowing better so far FF 3 only searches URLs and page titles. Does any one know better about Firefox 3?
Sidenote: In Opera the index size for pages indexed in cache can be tuned through the Preference Editor by MaxVisitedPagesIndexSize (supposingly in KB, -1 means unlimited, i.e. limited by cache size I presume and 0 means deactivated). By the way, there is another way to access history search if you’d like to focus more on prettier results overview. And yet another hint for the use of Opera’s version: It sorts the results by hits on URLs followed by those in page titles and the like, thereby ignoring punctuations (all?). Hence, if you know right away you want to search titles or descriptions of pages only start with a punctuation like so:
Saturday, 5th May 2007 at 23:10 (foobar2000, music, software)
Tags: ape, APEv2, audio, CDs, EAC, fb2k, foobar2000, MAC, Monkey's Audio Format
If someone is interested in archiving your audio CD collection in a really save manner to get rid of them after the encoding, or I should say transcoding process you might want to have a look at Neil Popham’s guide. Neil Popham, by the way, wrote some features for the APEv2 tagging tool wapet. His guide utilizes Windows batch scripts, adds tags and employs PAR2 for parity information. The later is needed to overcome seldom yet possible bit failures which would compromise an ape file. The ripping is done with EAC, the meanwhile well-known audio CD accurate ripping tool by Andre Wiethoff.
Using one single image file per CD has the benefit over multiple files to include, among others, audio information from before the first track, lead-in silence and TOC information. On the other hand, for audio library handling and daily playback where tagging plays a more important role, one file per track is much more comfy. That way all tags can be written directly to the audio file. This, however is resolutely limited with cue sheets. For example, with foobar2000 it’s transparent whether you have your playlist made up from an ape image with cue sheet or from multiple audio files with tags. It’s all the same with randomizing the list, seeking forward and backwards and the like. But once it comes to playback statistics or ReplayGain this will not be written to any file besides fb2k’s library database.
For my daily usage I copied the file MAC.exe (the actual encoder) from the Monkey’s Audio directory to foobar2000’s one and set up an encoding preset in it’s converter preferences using one of the following parameter taken from hydrogenaudio:
||Fast / large file
||High / medium file
||Insane / small file
Prefixed by the source and destination file variables %s %d. I mainly chose ape over flac because of ape’s flexible tagging feature and neglected the in terms of encoding far better codec OptimFROG because this one needs heaps of CPU usage for decoding (while listening). When CPU power is not a constraint any longer I will most likely switch to ofg (if at that time it still has the best compression around). Don’t forget to enable the secure mode for your CD drive in fb2k under file -> open audio cd… -> select your drive and than drive settings. You can also access the rip wizard from there. Or go via “add to playlist” and convert the tracks manually.
Update: I have found out about WavPack which IMHO is a much better choice to MAC (APE) and FLAC because of better support, tagging and hybrid mode.
Tuesday, 1st May 2007 at 14:33 (digital music, foobar2000, software, technical stuff)
Tags: fb2k, foobar2000, programming
Well, what I’m trying to do I thought would be very simple: Add a new tag to each file that’s been added to fb2k’s media library holding the current system date and hence add a “added to library” tag. The tagz script to achieve this is not even the problem.
Or, what seams to be semantically equivalent but more readable (refer to tagz reference to understand the commands):
This even checks if the file has a tag already. Using the tagz parser in the preference dialog (Ctrl+P -> Display -> Title Formatting) confirms it’s working correctly when playing a song without a tag and one with the time stamp set.
The set-up is this:
- with masstagger (right-click on song -> tagging -> manage scripts, if you haven’t changed the default context menu structure) add “Format value from other fields…“, select destination field name (ADDED_TO_FOOBAR) and use the stated script as formatting pattern. Hit Return and name your masstagger script and (important:) click the save button. Note: Using “Set value…” or the like will not work since it, despite intuitive guesses, does not evaluate tagz scripts but outputs it as a string.
- in fb2k’s preferences dialog select Tools -> New File Tagger and from the drop-down list select Tagging/Scripts/your name (do this after extensive testing on single files with the file’s preferences box open!)
Now each time a file is added to fb2k’s lib this script is run on it. BUT: It doesn’t do what it’s supposed to! What ends up in the files tags is
- a ‘?’ for those with no time stamp
- deleting the existing field when value = ‘?’
That’s when I noticed the two scripts are not equivalent: The first add an empty string to the requested field if present where the later does simply nothing in that case because there is no else branch. But still, even the later does not do the desired job.
Then I came up with this script:
But once again, the only effort is frustration but not the desired time stamp. After all it leaves existing fields untouched.
I could work around this issue with the “Stamp current Time and Date…” bit but since after reinstalling my OS and using fb2k before my music files partly are stamped already. Sidenote: Probably because of this the field name should rather be something like “ADDED_TO_LIBRARY”. Though moving on…
A working workaround I figured out is to
- add a “Stamp current Time and Date…”,
- use the following script
- add “Remove Field…” with selected “TIMESTAMP” field.
So that leaves me with speculating about a bug in either the masstagger or in foo_cwb_hooks. By the way, the time stamping option might be in foo_masstag_addons. You might want to include this masstagger script from a file.
Monday, 30th Apr 2007 at 22:12 (digital music, foobar2000, software, technical stuff)
Tags: fb2k, foobar2000
In case you wonder — like I did — to employ foobar2000 (fb2k) to handle the lack of ReplayGain (RG) info in a file’s tags nicely so it doesn’t blast away your eardrum I have a set of very usefull links. At hydrogenaudio.org I found the Intermediate User Guide for fb2k explaining, among others, the options one has setting up fb2k for ReplayGain. Most importantly one should slide the bar in the playback preferences pane for “without RG info” to a value that reflects the average sound level of all tracks. This, of course, would mean to scan all your files. For my couple’o weeks worth of playback time fb2k estimates just over 24h for that job. So it was an easy choise to just stick to the suggested value -8db.
Last but not least, I will mention the two preamps in the Playback preferences. Except if you know exactly what you are doing, it is not recommended to raise the output of the preamps above the default 0.0dB in any way. However you can use these to slightly compensate for the difference between replaygained and unreplaigained Tracks. Simply estimate your average Replaygain level and lower the preamp for files without Replaygain info by that value. I found -8dB to work quite well for me. This obviously should not be used to compensate for not properly Replaygaining your tracks, but definetaly will protect your ears and your equipment when coming across tracks that miss Replaygain info.
Secondly there is a more detailed description on the Playback settings in the same wiki. Besides some mathematics on RG it also points out some interesting knowlege about pre-buffering and DSP settings
Saturday, 7th Apr 2007 at 20:39 (foobar2000, ideas, music, software, technical stuff)
Tags: fb2k, foobar2000, programming
There are some thoughts I’d like to a. document but b. share, too. They are about — no, not about Techno music! — programming issues, or just ideas I would find useful if they where already realized. Maybe they are and only I don’t know about it jet. But also, I might be the one realizing them… let’s see.
Well, one thing that came to my mind by playing around with the MusicIP Mixer: Wasn’t it cool to have a free library like thing laying around that could easily be user by a software music player (or even extended to video, i.e. media player) to generate playlists similar to the MusicIP Mixer? To be more precise the features I’m thinking about are:
- generate playlists by user selected music title from library, that is giving back a list of songs from the user’s music library that have similar mood, tempo, harmony, …
- start playing tracks from the lib. The user can skip or pin it. Either one “pin” (as in MusicIP Mixer) is enough to start generating the list or maybe even keep on with more appropriate music (closer in the above terms). That’s especially useful for those audiophiles that just cannot remember artists or track names (like me). But also it’s faster in terms of I don’t have to sit down first and think about what I’d like to here right now but rather can just find out what I’d wanted to listen to in the first place.
To brake it down, the key note here is to have two methods generating playlists that are end-user orientated. You may ask: “Well, what the hack is so special about it? You mentioned MusicIP Mixer yourself, that does exactly that!” No, it does not. MusicIP Mixer, as fare as I know, is closed source. But more importantly the list generates are encapsulated within the Mixer software and cannot (again, as far as I know) be used by other software that MusicIP Mixer itself (I’ll digg in to find out when time permits). The generators that is; one can have the generated lists send to one’s music player of choice, easily. Which is fair dinkum.
An example: As of now I chose foobar2k to be my favorite music player as it is very customizable and produces good enough sound for my HiFi (gapless playback, replaygain, multiple format support, “tabbed playlisting“, has plugin API to name a few features and components). I runs more or less 24/7. Through the foo_playlist_tree I wrote a query which gives me 10h of random music, not yet listened to or not for more than two weeks. Of course there are also queries by audio format, … just by any combination of normal audio file tags plus more. But still if I might just want say 40 min of jogging music… mmh, that I could manage by all means, plus also the hassle of time consuming transfer to your portable player if your on the run… Not a good example. OK, imagine sitting on the couch with your fb2k (keyboard remote control configured, of course) ready to blast your ears away but you just can think of what so listen to. Even with my iPAQ running Minibar2k this would not really what ease my relaxed mood. Getting it? Comments, as always, appreciated!
Blogged with Flock
Tags: audio, programming, ideas